2 uri
Odprt je razpis: do 3.500 evrov za trajnostne certifikate v turizmu
3 ure
Brezplačen dogodek v ponedeljek: potencial AV-industrije
3 ure
Evropski indeksi v rdečem; SBI TOP okoli izhodišča
3 ure
Ljubljana kot nova varnostna točka regije
3 ure
Gradbeništvo med investicijskim optimizmom in sistemsko slepoto
4 ure
Janšev socializem: brezplačen osnovni bančni račun 10
4 ure
Zavarovalna skupina Sava pozitivno presenetila s 114,1 milijona evrov čistega dobička
4 ure
Joschka Fischer: »Trumpova politika pospešuje zaton ZDA« 3
4 ure
Sum kartela: Nenapovedane preiskave AVK v Aktivi, Sintalu in zbornici varovanja 1
5 ur
Cena nafte in plina spet kvišku. Katarski minister opozarja, da bi lahko šel sod nafte na 150 dolarjev
5 ur
Vodik se počasi vrača kot gonilna sila težkega transporta (PRO)
5 ur
Ukrajina vs. Rusija: kako sta v vojni zgoreli in se spremenili gospodarstvi 2
5 ur
Kmetje in zadruge zahtevajo ukrepe za reševanje krize z gnojili
5 ur
Nov zastoj pri razpisih: se je 59 milijonov zataknilo zaradi nekaj centov? 1
7 ur
Vlada sprejela strategijo umetne inteligence: cilj je suverena in zaupanja vredna raba tehnologije
7 ur
Kako je Golobova vlada pogrnila pri energetski prenovi javnih stavb
7 ur
Marta Kos za Bloomberg: Potrebna so nova pravila za hitrejši vstop Ukrajine v EU
8 ur
Triglav: lani 174 milijonov evrov dobička. Kakšne so obljube za dividende? 1
8 ur
Ukrajina ponuja pomoč proti iranskim dronom, v zameno hoče rakete Patriot 2
8 ur
Chat GPT: Kako z metodo C.O.R.E. do dobrega prompta

Izbrani forum: Nepremičnine

Izbrana tema: članek Pred vrati ZDA nova nepremičninska kriza

Teme v drugih forumih o teh vsebini:   Glavni forum (15)

Strani: 1

anon-106499 sporočil: 3.507
[#591380] 22.09.09 14:55
Odgovori   +    0
"ob izkoriščanju možnosti neplačila obresti, narastejo na 125 odstotkov začetne glavnice"

Da se podaš v tak kredit, si drugega argumenta kot nepremičnine bodo vedno rastle z najmanj 20% letno, skoraj ne znam predstavljati
anon-182910 sporočil: 1.666
[#591397] 22.09.09 15:11
Odgovori   +    0
Druga runda se začenja.
anon-124839 sporočil: 184
[#591416] 22.09.09 15:23
Odgovori   +    0
Dober članek, bravo Uroš! Niso problem le subprime mortgages, tudi prvoklasne hipotekarne kredite je brez veze plačevat, če je dolg bistveno večji od vrednosti nepremičnine.Here we go again - real estate crisis (part II).
anon-175174 sporočil: 2.360
[#591425] 22.09.09 15:32 · odgovor na: anon-106499 (#591380)
Odgovori   +    1
Baje, za ziher ne vem ker nisem od tam, so v Kaliforniji ljudje dejansko bili prepričani, da bo njihova nepremičnina v prihodnje apreciirala za 20 odstotkov letno. Evo citat iz enega od kometrjev tipa, ki ja napovedal sesutje nepremičninskega trga: " And especially when they had so much to gain. Real-estate prices were rising. At one point, in California they took a survey — I think back in 2005 — and the average home buyer believed that his house was going to appreciate by 20 percent a year for the next ten years. That was what was expected. 
Now, you think about it. At the time, the average California home was selling for about $500,000, which was about ten times what the average household actually earned.So, but these guys actually believed that if they bought that house they would make $3 million over the next ten years. That's what they believed.Now, is it any wonder that they lied on their mortgage to get that $3 million? Is it any wonder that they signed up for a teaser rate? Do you think they cared what happened to the loan two or three or five years from now?....http://mises.org/story/3493
anon-176723 sporočil: 218
[#591713] 22.09.09 22:21
Odgovori   +    0
Uroš in Inforwarrior hvala. Izčrpno in uporabno.
anon-11660 sporočil: 48.253
[#592106] 23.09.09 10:29
Odgovori   +    0
Vir tudi bc123a, poleti 2007, ko je ta graf prilimal na forum.
anon-11660 sporočil: 48.253
[#592112] 23.09.09 10:32 · odgovor na: anon-11660 (#592106)
Odgovori   +    0

bc123a je napisal(a):
Vir tudi bc123a, poleti 2007, ko je ta graf prilimal na forum.
 
In zapisal tole:

forum.finance.si/?t=...083#109777
anon-106499 sporočil: 3.507
[#592166] 23.09.09 10:54 · odgovor na: anon-175174 (#591425)
Odgovori   +    0

KondaU je napisal(a):
Baje, za ziher ne vem ker nisem od tam, so v Kaliforniji ljudje dejansko bili prepričani, da bo njihova nepremičnina v prihodnje apreciirala za 20 odstotkov letno. Evo citat iz enega od kometrjev tipa, ki ja napovedal sesutje nepremičninskega trga: " And especially when they had so much to gain. Real-estate prices were rising. At one point, in California they took a survey — I think back in 2005 — and the average home buyer believed that his house was going to appreciate by 20 percent a year for the next ten years. That was what was expected. 
Now, you think about it. At the time, the average California home was selling for about $500,000, which was about ten times what the average household actually earned.So, but these guys actually believed that if they bought that house they would make $3 million over the next ten years. That's what they believed.Now, is it any wonder that they lied on their mortgage to get that $3 million? Is it any wonder that they signed up for a teaser rate? Do you think they cared what happened to the loan two or three or five years from now?....http://mises.org/story/3493
LOL. Ja špricanje matematike v šoli se res ne izplača :)

Strani: 1


vm-kiva