[crt]
> [bc123a]
> Del, ki govori o climate change je totalno sfaljen, ker dejansko domneva da EU karkoli vec naredi v tej smeri od USA

ne uspem videti tega v tekstu.

tole me je zmotilo:

The issue of Climate Change will play out, as a major theme, in the trade war between America and the EU. A recent report showed the impact of global warming on the German economy, via its trade artery of the River Rhine. The latest forecasts, from the hydrologists and satellite-imagers, are that this is going to get worse across the whole Eurozone.

One current barrier to a trade agreement, between America and the EU, is the lack of commonality on rules and regulations in relation to emissions and Climate Change. The Europeans, as we see above, have no choice but to push for tighter standards. President Trump is in denial of Climate Change and in any case has an America First strategy that is antipathetic towards it in principle.

There is therefore no fundamental common ground between the two sides, so that a trade deal which encompasses the European Climate Change agenda is totally out of the question. It can be said, in fact, that both sides are in fundamental opposition on this issue; thereby ruling out any deal. Indeed, it is in America's strategic interest to weaken Europe economically through higher emissions.

Mislim da se iz podatkov ter iz logike ne da nikakor sklepati da je ameriska politika tako daljnovidna, da bi nalasc sesuvala evropo s klimatskimi spremembami, preko vpliva na visino reke Ren... cmon, to je pa res tako za lase privleceno.

glede zakaj so deuropska naprezanja videti fake -- zaradi shizofrene situacije za nemcijo, kot je opisana;

to pa ze, ampak si ziher prebral cel clanek? :)