macon je napisal(a):
MOT: "What’s' your impression, who is the one who has really made the decision, was it the minister or…?"
Milan Svajger, Sistemska Tehnika: "Decision was not made by minister of defense. Minister of defense is just a marionette. Decisions are made behind, very close to the prime minister."
MOT: "Why do you think so?"
Svajger: "Because I know! Because our prime minister was 1991 minister of defense, his profession is defense."   

Drago Kos: "Our main finding was that two bidders who were running for this job, there was not equal treatment among them. We found out that Finnish Patria company were prioritized and that Slovenian company was not prioritized, was not treated equally. We're not saying that armoured vehicle production in Slovenia is better than in Finland, but we're saying that the procedure that was used was unfair and against he basic rules of public procurement here in Slovenia…"   

VO: Potocnik is acting as advisor to the President of Slovenia. He has acted as police chief under the present government. He refused to be pushed around (by politicians). He knows what he is talking about .
(Interview with Potocnik)  MOT: "So, it is reasonable to really think that the minister of interior has stopped the investigation around Patria and he has been taking orders from the prime minister?"
Potocnik: "I'm serious. I have no evidence to say this , but I'm almost convinced, that is. Because based on daily life, was he minister of interior for any kind of decision he asked prime minister."  (Graphics: Patria– Riedl, Wien 14 Million – Jure Cekuta 2,8 Million – Walter Wolf 8,3 Million)

Based on daily life = ker sem slišal na tržnici, ker je mačka na repu prinesla itd... Model tudi pravi, da nima dokazov.

Kos je velika neodvisna tudi mednarodna avtoriteta, Potočnik je ocenjen malo bolj zgoraj.

Tu zgoraj je vse opisano. Vidi se, koga vse je finski novinar intervjuval in jasno je, kakšni zaključki so samoumevno sledili. Cvikl, Potočnik in Kos so pač z vsemi štirimi zagrabili priložnost in še za finsko TV rutinirano ponovili mantro, ki jo v Sloveniji znamo že na pamet (Janša = olićenje svakoga zla na kugli zemaljskoj).

Zaradi izključujočega vzorca intervjuvancev, katerih imena za Fince sicer zvenijo eksotično in prepričljivo (podobno bi za naivno slovensko javnost zvenele recimo navedbe nekega Juhe Kankkunnena in Jorme Havasälainena, o katerih preteklih ravnanjih in dejanjih prej ta ista javnost nikoli ne bi slišala) , je logično postaviti pod vprašaj vsaj objektivnost  raziskave. Zakaj se finski novinar ni potrudil in povprašal o mnenju vsaj še nekoga iz vladne strani, recimo  Ehjavca ? Ker mu je šlo predvsem za  efekt TV prispevka, manj pa za odkrivanje resnice. Ehjavec bi pač še enkrat povedal, da je Sistemska tehnika ponudila neobstoječi izdelek za precej višjo ceno od Patrie, to pa za gledalce seveda ne bi bilo zanimivo, ker potem ni nobenega grešnega kozla in nobene zarote.

Dejansko vsebina oddaje ni nič novega, le iste, že slišane obtožbe so nam bile sedaj postrežene iz drugega , 'kao' bolj kredibilnega vira.

Upam, da bodo vsi slovenski mediji (vključno z Delom, Magom in Večerom) objavili natančen transkript oddaje, po potrebi pa tudi korekten prevod.