[simona2]
to, da je italija trg za nemske proizvode, se da tudi brez evra

ja, vendar z evrom se da lazje, ker ni devalvacij in imas tako stabilne izvozne cene kot tudi stabilno odsotnost lokalne konkurencne robe.

na splosno je po moje zelo smiselno se pri vsaki politicni potezi vprasati po ekonomski podlagi, ker politika ni nekaj, kar se dogaja v vakuumu. ce se znajdes v situaciji "ta poteza je bila politicna in ne ekonomska", je verjetno za znova pogledat. cui bono vedno obstaja. le da ponavadi dejanski odgovor ni enak marketinskemu.

Problem okoli Italije pa se dotika tudi vprašanja, kdaj so postala raztegljiva vprašanja finančne moči držav in spoštovanja pravil. Zares leta 2018, ko zaradi Italije Juncker in komisija raztegujeta pravila pakta za stabilnost in rast?

Charles Wyplosz, professor of international economics at the Graduate Institute in Geneva, has compiled a table using statistics from the European Commission.

This shows that of 12 members of the single currency, 10 have run up budget deficits beyond the 3 per cent limit since 1999. From 1999-2011, Greece has broken the rules every year, Portugal in 10 of those years and Italy eight. Next is France (seven), followed by Germany (five). In contrast, Ireland, which had to be bailed out because of the state of its public finances, was outside the 3 per cent limit in four of those years.

(ce za hip zanemarimo, da to, da je irska morala biti bailed out zaradi state of its public finances, ni tocno oziroma ni ravno prislo iz zraka, temvec iz ultimata ecb, kako ravnati glede bank...)