[jaki79]
> [Petunija1]

> Morda je pa fora v tem, da je Peterson pravilno diagnoziral kakšno stvar, se strinjam denimo, da je post-modernizem navadno govno, ne ponuja pa ustreznih rešitev za zatečeno stanje, zato večino časa tava v temi in govori neumnosti ter je za razliko od Chomskega, ki je izrazito naklonjen feminizmu, navaden, v celofan zavit šovinist.

Ti še kar ne boš prenehala s svojimi lažmi, s katerimi si ohranjaš svoj napihnjeni ego, kajne? Da je Chomsky izrazito naklonjen feminizmu?

"One issue that at times has been raised about Chomsky by those who support him (or would otherwise) is his comparably lukewarm attitude towards feminism. Indeed, he's only ever tangentially discussed it in any real sense, much to the chagrin of anarcha-feminists. While it's very safe to say that he is in no way anti-feminist or against feminism, he doesn't seem interested in exploring it to the same degree he has with other movements, whatever connotations that might carry.

Responding to an accusation from a former student of his that he was an "old fashioned patriarch" and "has never really understood what the feminist movement is about", Chomsky chose to contest the semantics of the latter statement, while not really denying the former."

Hvala bogu za tipko ignore.

... čuj, Petunija je res precej svojeglava, ampak na tole forum.finance.si/?m=...767&single ni imela nobenih pripomb ...

P.S.: ne zameri, ker sem mešam v vaše špeckahlanje, ampak na totem forumu je že nekaj let takšen dolgcajt, da lahko preberem čisto vse in še vedno nimam kaj pametnega za brat, pa v več kot 10 letih nikoli - glej P.S. v nalimanem postu - nobenega nisem imel na ignore ...