Izbrani forum: Glavni forum
Izbrana tema: članek Veter se obrača proti tehnološkim velikanom
Prikaz samo enega sporočila - znotraj teme...
[#2704860] 29.03.18 07:59 · odgovor na: (# 2704823)
[sopranos]Mogoce po logiki da se naslanjajo na Muskove sanje namesto da dobre prakse in izkusnje drugih proizvajalcev? Ocitno je Tesla resno zajebal z avtomatizacijo linije. Roboti namrec niso zastonj in ocitno je veliko dela tudi na zahodu, ki ga lahko clovek naredi ucinkoviteje.
> Tretjic, po kaksni logiki je Tesla IT firma?!?
Mogoče po tisti, po kateri je Uber zgolj aplikacija in ne taxi podjetje, ki ima svojo aplikacijo? :)
techcrunch.com/2018/...lysts-say/
But while all that exotic capital might allow Tesla to remove 5 workers, it will then need to hire a skilled engineer to manage, programme and maintain robots for $100 an hour (our estimate of a robotic engineers’ hourly rate).
So the net labour saving may be only $50 per unit. Yet putting the automation into the plant seems to involve an apparent capital cost that’s $4,000 higher per unit of capacity than for a normal plant. If the product is built for 7 years, that’s over US$550 of additional depreciation per unit built. It’s hard to see an economic case even if somehow the Fremont Model 3 line can be made to work. So why exactly has Tesla taken this route? It’s unclear.
Vse ocene tega sporočila:
Gostje ne morejo pregledovati ocen