Strani: 1

anon-232734 sporočil: 4.441
[#1499865] 20.12.11 22:41
Odgovori   +    0
A nista dva od naštetih že bivša? Monika, preveč žuraš pa ne mislš na aktualne novice z bančnih parketov?
MM1411 sporočil: 4.807
[#1499946] 20.12.11 23:57
Odgovori   +    3
Tajkuni, hitro na banke, bodo spet delile gotovinske kredite!
bozga sporočil: 6.303
[#1500216] 21.12.11 08:45
Odgovori   +    2
Samo v ZDA so iz evropskih bank Američani dvignili več denarja, kot ga zdaj ECB namenja kreditiranju celega bančnega sistema v EU: sicer pa je to pozitiven ukrep, ki naj bi preprečeval zlom bančnega sistema v EU.
anon-166593 sporočil: 484
[#1500221] 21.12.11 08:47
Odgovori   +    1
Slovenske banke nimajo garancije za tak denar. Razen seveda večne naivnosti ljudstva in upa, da ga bo spet lahko obrala in nateganila, ko bo čas za poplačilo iz naših žepov. Cena?Sitnica! ddv dvignejo, pa davke 5x zaračunajo, ipd Upam,d a ne dobijo denarja in bodo prisiljeni enkrat polagati račune in zapreti svoja vrata. Pa bomo mogoče začelil na dnu, a pošteno. Banke so kapitalističen produkt stare stotine let, pa še vedno delajo na naivnosti ljudi, reklmirajo kreditiranje in nato poberejo ljudem up do življenja in postenja.
anon-183794 sporočil: 747
[#1500256] 21.12.11 09:08
Odgovori   +    1
Poceni denar centralnih bankirjev neizbežno vodi v razvrednotenje tega. To nikakor ni primeren ukrep. Če hočejo banke kreditirati, naj zbirajo depozite in BASTA!!!
anon-266336 sporočil: 1.899
[#1500901] 21.12.11 14:34
Odgovori   +    0
"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled." Professor. J. K. Galbraith

This is how it’s done…. a simplified example...

Let’s take a small hypothetical bank. It has ten depositors/savers who have just deposited £500 each.
The bank owes them £5000 and it has £5000 to pay out what it owes. (It will keep that £5000 in an account at the Bank of England – what it has in this account are called its liquid assets).
Sid, an entrepreneur, now approaches the bank for a £5000 loan to help him to set up a business.
This is granted on the basis of repayment in 12 months - plus 10% interest – more on that later.
A new account is opened in Sid’s name. It has nothing in it, nevertheless the bank allows Sid to withdraw and spend £5000.
The depositors are not consulted about the loan. They are not told that their money is no longer available to them– The amounts shown in their accounts are not reduced and transferred to Sid’s account.
In granting this loan, the bank has increased its obligations to £10,000. Sid is entitled to £5000, but the depositors can still claim their £5000.
If the bank now has obligations of £10,000, then isn’t it insolvent, because it only had £5000 of deposits in the first place? Not exactly..
The bank treats the loan to Sid as an ASSET, not a liability, on the basis that Sid now owes the bank £5000.
The bank’s balance sheet will show that it owes its depositors £5000, and it is now owed £5000 by Sid. It has created for itself a new asset of £5000 in the form of a debt owed by Sid where nothing existed before - this on top of any of the original deposits still in its account at the Bank of England. - it is solvent - at least for accounting purposes!
(At this stage the bank is gambling that as Sid is spending his loan, the depositors won’t all want to withdraw their deposits!)
The bank had a completely free hand in the creation of this £5000 loan which, as we shall see, represents new "money", where nothing existed before. It was done at the stroke of a pen or the pressing of a computer key.
The idea that banks create something out of nothing and then charge interest on it for private profit might seem pretty repellent. Anyone else doing it would be guilty of fraud or counterfeiting!

New "money" into the economy...

Sid’s loan effectively becomes new "money" as it is spent by him to pay for equipment, rent and wages etc. in connection with his new business.
This new "money" is thus distributed to other people, who will in turn use it to pay for goods and services - soon it will be circulating throughout the economy.
As it circulates, it inevitably ends up in other people’s bank accounts.
When it is paid into someone’s account which is not overdrawn, it is a further deposit - Sid pays his secretary £100 and she opens an account at our hypothetical bank – it now has £5100 of deposits.

If we assume for a moment that the remaining £4900 ends up in the accounts of the original depositors of our hypothetical bank, it now has another £4900 in deposits - £10000 in total if the depositors have not touched their original deposits. In practice much of it would end up in depositors accounts at other banks, but either way there is now £5000 of new "money" in circulation.

Thus in reality, all deposits with banks and elsewhere actually come from "money" originally created as loans – (except where the deposits are made in cash – more on cash very shortly).

If you have £500 in your bank account, the fact is someone else like Sid went into debt to provide it.

The key to the whole thing is the fact that :-

Cash withdrawals account for only a tiny percentage of a bank’s business.
Bank customers today make almost all payments between themselves by cheque, switch, direct debit or electronic transfer etc. Their individual accounts are adjusted accordingly by changing a few figures in computer databases – just book keeping entries. No actual money/cash changes hands. The whole thing is basically an accounting process that takes place within the banking system.
jato sporočil: 643
[#1501165] 21.12.11 16:52
Odgovori   +    0
pa ga bomo zopet srali

Strani: 1