[alek14]
Tole moram pa takoj debunkat.

Škoda truda za digestat digestata neke študije. Raje pojdi po prebavnem traktu navzgor, kjer je informacijskih nesmislov in bližnjičnih dezinformacij manj.

The cost of producing one megawatt-hour of electricity — a standard way to measure electricity production — is now around $50 for solar power, according to Lazard's math.
While solar is getting much cheaper, Lazard notes that these sources of electricity are not a panacea. LCOE as a measurement does not take into account some external costs, like storing solar power for cloudy days, which is one of the lingering obstacles preventing the widespread adoption of solar. (Other sources of electricity like coal or natural gas don't have the same problem, of course.)
www.weforum.org/agen...out-on-top

Nima se smisla tudi razburjati nad nesmiselnim omenjanjem spremenljivega problema oblačnih dni, ko je največji problem solarne energetike, ki je stalen in praktično nespremenljiv, kako preživeti vsako noč. :-)

P.S.: Za najbolj radovedne še Lazardov oriđinal, da lahko preverite, če navedene vrednosti držijo za Oslo in Seattle enako kot za Palermo in Phoenix.
www.lazard.com/persp...ergy-2017/

[pobalin]
> [alek14]
> Tole moram pa takoj debunkat.

Škoda truda za digestat digestata neke študije. Raje pojdi po prebavnem traktu navzgor, kjer je informacijskih nesmislov in bližnjičnih dezinformacij manj.

> The cost of producing one megawatt-hour of electricity — a standard way to measure electricity production — is now around $50 for solar power, according to Lazard's math.
> While solar is getting much cheaper, Lazard notes that these sources of electricity are not a panacea. LCOE as a measurement does not take into account some external costs, like storing solar power for cloudy days, which is one of the lingering obstacles preventing the widespread adoption of solar. (Other sources of electricity like coal or natural gas don't have the same problem, of course.)
> www.weforum.org/agen...out-on-top

Nima se smisla tudi razburjati nad nesmiselnim omenjanjem spremenljivega problema oblačnih dni, ko je največji problem solarne energetike, ki je stalen in praktično nespremenljiv, kako preživeti vsako noč. :-)

P.S.: Za najbolj radovedne še Lazardov oriđinal, da lahko preverite, če navedene vrednosti držijo za Oslo in Seattle enako kot za Palermo in Phoenix.
www.lazard.com/persp...ergy-2017/

Kako preživeti vsako noč, je praktično zanemarljiv problem.
Kako preživeti vsako zimo (od konca oktobra do konca marca) cca 5x30=150 dni...to pa je Problem z veliko začetnico.