"Če pravniki vemo, da so pravičnost in človekove pravice nad zakonom, pa nas je ta kriza naučila še nečesa: tudi človečnost in humanost sta nad zakonom."

Ja. Verjetno se zato uvaja humano šeriatsko pravo v VB. Dokler se pravnik ni/če se ne opredeli do te zadeve ga ne jemljem resno. Problem ni od včeraj. Pravniki so soodgovorni ker s svojim molkom dopuščajo napad na zahodno pravo. Odgovarjali bodo pred zgodovino. (Bom hvaležen, če bo kje kdo izbrskal kakšnega pravnika, ki je kaj napisal na to temo.)*

"In pravno: katera ureditev v EU (še) velja?..."

Ne vem zakaj bi se potem obremenjevali s pravom. Ukinimo šengen, ukinimo kvote in sprejmimo vse, ki želijo v EU.

"Rešitve bo treba iskati bližje državam, od koder so begunci, jim z mednarodno humanitarno pomočjo omogočiti, da tam prebivajo kot begunci, saj se bodo le tako po koncu vojne lahko vrnili domov."

Ta film bi pa rad gledal.

Drugače sem pa tudi jaz za mir na svetu...

* Zanimivo, da se s tem vprašanjem ukvarja filozof, pravniki pa spijo spanje pravičnega.

" Refugees should be assured of their safety, but it should also be made clear to them that they must accept the destination allocated to them by European authorities, and that they will have to respect the laws and social norms of European states: no tolerance of religious, sexist or ethnic violence; no right to impose on others one’s own religion or way of life; respect for every individual’s freedom to abandon his or her communal customs, etc. If a woman chooses to cover her face, her choice must be respected; if she chooses not to cover her face, her freedom not to do so must be guaranteed. Such rules privilege the Western European way of life, but that is the price to be paid for European hospitality. These rules should be clearly stated and enforced, by repressive measures – against foreign fundamentalists as well as against our own racists – where necessary."

www.lrb.co.uk/2015/0...-of-norway