[kokodar]
Ker prav v članku govorite o slo. pravoverni zategnjenosti, čeprav obstajajo kljub EU in našim birokratskim kretenom zadovoljivi "obvodi", bi priporočil malo kreativnosti, ki bi bila prijazna do vaših bralcev. Ko se sprehajam po drugih spl. medijih (npr. Dnevnik, Delo, požarr., ipd.) me ne "napada" taka vsiljivost kot pri vas! Če ne klikneš na "se strinjam", potem po logiki pomeni, da se ne strinjaš in pika. Zakaj bi sploh moral kaj klikati?!

ne skrbet, da nam tukaj ne bi bilo jasno, kaj je bolj prijazno do uporabnika. smo vsi ne ravno od vceraj v tem.

kar si opisal, je ravno razlika med principoma opt-out in opt-in, ki sta trenutno center dogajanja v tej zgodbi.

v grobem (!!),

opt-out = uproabniku poljubno mecemo piskotke in samo kazemo obvestilo, ce stran uporablja, se ocitno strinja, razen ce bo naknadno izrecno oznacil, da se ne

opt-in = uporabnika moramo najprej vprasati, kako se opredeljuje, sele potem lahko posiljamo (razen ko gre za nujne elemente strani, pri cemer se seveda odpre tudi debata, kaj je to nujnost)

trenutni vtis je, da v nasprotju z eu-wide prakso, ki gre po prvi alineji, v sloveniji pooblascenka zeli videti drugo alinejo. (zato so finance sledile tej, s stisnjenimi zobmi in kazanjem proti nebu s primernim prstom.)

razlicne strani (tudi v isti panogi) pa imajo to trenutno razlicno reseno, ker se je pac praksa komaj zacela in sele zbiramo signale z drugega planeta, kaj mislijo o konkretnih taksnih ali drugacnih izvedbah.

[crt]
kar si opisal, je ravno razlika med principoma opt-out in opt-in, ki sta trenutno center dogajanja v tej zgodbi.

v grobem (!!),

opt-out = uproabniku poljubno mecemo piskotke in samo kazemo obvestilo, ce stran uporablja, se ocitno strinja, razen ce bo naknadno izrecno oznacil, da se ne

opt-in = uporabnika moramo najprej vprasati, kako se opredeljuje, sele potem lahko posiljamo (razen ko gre za nujne elemente strani, pri cemer se seveda odpre tudi debata, kaj je to nujnost)

trenutni vtis je, da v nasprotju z eu-wide prakso, ki gre po prvi alineji, v sloveniji pooblascenka zeli videti drugo alinejo. (zato so finance sledile tej, s stisnjenimi zobmi in kazanjem proti nebu s primernim prstom.)

razlicne strani (tudi v isti panogi) pa imajo to trenutno razlicno reseno, ker se je pac praksa komaj zacela in sele zbiramo signale z drugega planeta, kaj mislijo o konkretnih taksnih ali drugacnih izvedbah.

Tole bo mogoče koga zanimalo, zgleda bi bil ICO čisto zadovoljen samo z obvestilom, morda celo brez pop-upa, birokrati (naši sploh) so pa stvar potegnili v ekstrem. Zgodba je iz UK:
forums.oscommerce.co...ge__st__20

OK - I spoke to the FSB lawyers - and they were almost as confused as me!

So today I have spoken to a very helpful man at the ICO and explained to him what my site is about, what cookies are set (ie, site cookies, analyitics cookies, Google +1, Facebook Like, and a couple of others) and what action I have taken ie:

1) Placed a header at the top of every page stating : "We place cookies on your computer to allow the shopping system to work and to help us improve our website. To find out more about the cookies, see our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use this site you are agreeing to allow cookies to be set" - there is also a link to the privacy policy.

2) In the privacy policy I have included an explanation of what cookies are, what they do, and a table listing the ones that are set. I have also included a paragraph about third party cookies (Google +1, Facebook, You Tube)

So I am using the "Implied Consent" system.

The man at the ICO, whilst not stating that this was the right way to go, stated that it was apparent that I had read the guidelines and had embodied the changes as I felt appropriate for my site and that it would appear that I was complying with the rules.

Therefore I am now happy with the situation without having to resort to java pop up boxes and opt in / out systems.

Lp,
M