Izbrani forum: Glavni forum
Izbrana tema: članek Slovenci smo svetovni prvaki v številu zaposlenih na državnih inštitutih
Prikaz samo enega sporočila - znotraj teme...
[#1947338] 07.01.13 12:49
Naj navedem samo cisto majhen (itsy bitsy) delcek tega protokola, ki pa, mislim lahko postane silno velik problem ker hipoma razbije mit o malodane prislovični kakovosti SLO znanosti.
Authorship
All persons designated as authors should qualify for authorship. Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content.
Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to
1) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of data; and to
2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and on
3) final approval of the version to be published.
Conditions 1, 2, and 3 must all be met.
Participation solely in the acquisition of funding or the collection of data does not justify authorship.
General supervision of the research group is not sufficient for authorship. Any part of an article critical to its main conclusions must be the responsibility of at least one author.
Neposredni odgovori na sporočilo št. 1947338
Strani: 1
[#1947599] 07.01.13 15:43 · odgovor na: (# 1947338)
[financar57]Tole je nonsens in sploh ne uposteva dejanske situacije v znanosti. Navajanje odgovornega za financiranje koristi obojim: tudi raziskovalcem, ker ima odgovorni za financiranje boljse sanse za pridobitev novih projektov, s tem pa bodo tudi ostali raziskovalci obdrzali delovna mesta.
Participation solely in the acquisition of funding or the collection of data does not justify authorship.
General supervision of the research group is not sufficient for authorship. Any part of an article critical to its main conclusions must be the responsibility of at least one author.
To sploh ni noben slovenski unikum, ampak se tako dela po celem svetu in to z razlogom.
Strani: 1