Izbrani forum: Glavni forum
Izbrana tema: članek Popolna liberalizacija trga poštnih storitev
Prikaz samo enega sporočila - znotraj teme...
[#1046254] 02.01.11 23:22 · odgovor na: (# 1046207)
[jani639]Khm, prvo kot prvo. Privatizirale se bi železnice in ne sama infrastruktura. To bi bilo za začetek. Kasneje pa se bi lahko s koncesijami obnavljali in dograjevali želežniški tiri in ostale pripadajoče stvari;) Sploh pa a se nesreče niso nikoli dogajale pri državnih železnicah?
> [čarli]
> > [zeele]
> > Se bojim, da je pojem liberalizacija postal sinonim za sranje, nategovanje, slabšanje kvalitete in večanje negotovosti. Verjetno lahko pričakujemo, da bodo sedaj pisma prihajala na želen naslov le z neko gotovostjo Vsako tretje bo izgubljeno.
>
> Zgodovina ni na tvoji strani glede liberalizacije;) Je pa potrebno našo pošto vsekakor čimprej privatizirat dokler je še kaj vredna...
seveda,britanci bi ti z ritmi ploskal..
en.wikipedia.org/wik...itish_Rail
www.libertarian.co.u...onn091.pdf
Če že limaš linke pol si jih sam preberi, ker piše namreč tole:
The railway in the UK was pioneered by the
private sector. State interference was pretty minimal. The
state pushed through the Acts which allowed the railway to be
built, they interfered a bit with 3rd class ticketing, they set up
safety legislation but by and large the State kept out of the
way of the running of the railway. The result was fantastic.
Revolutionary even. Until, that was, the Second World War.
The State took control of the railway as a wartime measure
but didnt nearly compensate the railway enough for the loss
of fares and for wartime damage. The railway didnt quite go
bust but it had no money for investment and in the spirit of
the time was duly nationalised. There then followed a long
period of decline.
Ko je bila zadeva v začetku privat je kar funkcionirala. Zanimivo a ne? ;)
Neposredni odgovori na sporočilo št. 1046254
Strani: 1
[#1046304] 03.01.11 00:18 · odgovor na: (# 1046254)
[čarli]
> [jani639]
> > [čarli]
> > > [zeele]
> > > Se bojim, da je pojem liberalizacija postal sinonim za sranje, nategovanje, slabšanje kvalitete in večanje negotovosti. Verjetno lahko pričakujemo, da bodo sedaj pisma prihajala na želen naslov le z neko gotovostjo Vsako tretje bo izgubljeno.
> >
> > Zgodovina ni na tvoji strani glede liberalizacije;) Je pa potrebno našo pošto vsekakor čimprej privatizirat dokler je še kaj vredna...
>
> seveda,britanci bi ti z ritmi ploskal..
>
>
>
> en.wikipedia.org/wik...itish_Rail
>
> www.libertarian.co.u...onn091.pdf
Khm, prvo kot prvo. Privatizirale se bi železnice in ne sama infrastruktura. To bi bilo za začetek. Kasneje pa se bi lahko s koncesijami obnavljali in dograjevali želežniški tiri in ostale pripadajoče stvari;) Sploh pa a se nesreče niso nikoli dogajale pri državnih železnicah?
Če že limaš linke pol si jih sam preberi, ker piše namreč tole:
The railway in the UK was pioneered by the
private sector. State interference was pretty minimal. The
state pushed through the Acts which allowed the railway to be
built, they interfered a bit with 3rd class ticketing, they set up
safety legislation but by and large the State kept out of the
way of the running of the railway. The result was fantastic.
Revolutionary even. Until, that was, the Second World War.
The State took control of the railway as a wartime measure
but didnt nearly compensate the railway enough for the loss
of fares and for wartime damage. The railway didnt quite go
bust but it had no money for investment and in the spirit of
the time was duly nationalised. There then followed a long
period of decline.
Ko je bila zadeva v začetku privat je kar funkcionirala. Zanimivo a ne? ;)
ja sej...zmagovalna kombinacija. taboljše(donosne) bomo privatiziral,infrastruktura s katero je sama jeba pa naj ostane davkoplačevalska...čestitam
jeeeeeeezus,pišeš ,kopiraš o 70 let starih zadevah..vpraš enga čistokrvnega britanca kako je sedaj..
Strani: 1