[hocevarb]
Če ne verjamete meni, preberite na primer NY Times:
www.nytimes.com/2015...hange.html

Some social scientists, policy makers and others have previously suggested that the drought played a role in the Syrian unrest, and the researchers addressed this as well, saying the drought “had a catalytic effect.” They cited studies that showed that the extreme dryness, combined with other factors, including misguided agricultural and water-use policies of the Syrian government, caused crop failures that led to the migration of as many as 1.5 million people from rural to urban areas. This in turn added to social stresses that eventually resulted in the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad in March 2011.

To je tipicna zloraba klimatskih sprememb o katerih sem govoril. O umazanem denarju. Ker ljudje upajo pisati taksne stvari kot je boldan stavek.

Bohpomagaj, pa sedaj je ze jasno da so "popular uprisings" v arabski pomladi bili podprti tudi s strani zahoda, tako kot "popular uprising" v Ukrajini. Assada so se malo bolj napicili, ker je bil vedno pro-rusko orientiran in so ZDA imele res hud interes da se ga znebijo, brez intervencije, ki so jo morale izvesti da se znebijo Saddama - tako Assad kot Sadam sta brata po ideologiji, Baathista.

Pa ce ze hocete, tule je opis v wikipediji, ki govori o stevilnih druzbenih vzrokih: en.wikipedia.org/wik...rab_Spring


Preberite se enkrat clanek. Govori o susi. Ki je povezana z kupom drugih stvari. No, na koncu pa so gnide vtaknili se spekulacijo, ki je nastala v glavah NEKATERIH social scientists, da lahko svoj climate research fajn upravicijo. Vse prav pride za prikazovanje podnebnih sprememb kot ze sedaj kataklizmicnih. Kot je ze NemirniTujec napisal, Sirija je ocitno res v prav posebnem klimatskem pasu...