Izbrani forum: Glavni forum
Izbrana tema: članek Prvi mož Feda nakazal upočasnitev dinamike zategovanja denarne politike
Strani: 1
sporočil: 21.898
centralne banke naj bi bile z razlogom neodvisne...kaki neodvisne. centralne banke seveda niso neodvisne, so orodje najbogatejsih za upravljanje s svetom. ti isti lastniki potem prodajajo zgodbo o "neodvisnosti", ki jo potem folk kupuje
sporočil: 30.415
[BeliF]Banka Slovenije zagotovo ni neodvisna, kajti v Sloveniji ni ničesar neodvisnega, tudi delitev oblasti na neodvisno zakonodajno, neodvisno izvršno in neodvisno sodno vejo. V praksi imamo avtokratsko izvršno oblast - vlado, ki preko koalicijskih sporazumov obvladuje zakonodajno in sodno vejo. V drugih državah vlade to počnejo bolj diskretno, v Sloveniji diskrecija ni potrebno, ker smo tudi volivci sprejeli (!?), da smo z izvolitvijo vlade postali njen plen. Najtežje je sprejeti dejstvo, da je sodna veja oblasti, kljub trajnemu mandatu, svojo neodvisnost pragmatično podredila vladi in politiki.
centralne banke naj bi bile z razlogom neodvisne...
sporočil: 9.333
Je začetek mrka, ko (ne)vidna roka trga
(FED-a...) na vrata Bele hiše močno trka ?
Sodražan
(FED-a...) na vrata Bele hiše močno trka ?
Sodražan
sporočil: 4.080
Če bodo še enkrat povišali obresti samo iz inata, da kontrirajo
Trumpu, potem jih pa tudi kar en klinc gleda. Njih, njihovo
strokovnost in neodvisnost.
Tole je potem eno zelo simpl predsedniško orodje. Če želi spremeniti denarno politiko, samo nekaj krepkih javno izreče, pa bodo že plesali, sicer zdi se v nasprotju z izrečenim. Ampak predsednik lahko tudi enostavno izreče nekaj nasprotnega, kar v resnici hoče. Pa smo vkup.
Tole je potem eno zelo simpl predsedniško orodje. Če želi spremeniti denarno politiko, samo nekaj krepkih javno izreče, pa bodo že plesali, sicer zdi se v nasprotju z izrečenim. Ampak predsednik lahko tudi enostavno izreče nekaj nasprotnega, kar v resnici hoče. Pa smo vkup.
sporočil: 14.456
Historical Perspective on Financial Stability
The term "financial stability" has a particular meaning in this context. A stable financial system is one that continues to function effectively even in severely adverse conditions. A stable system meets the borrowing and investment needs of households and businesses despite economic turbulence. An unstable system, in contrast, may amplify turbulence and prolong economic hardship in the face of stress by failing to provide these essential services when they are needed most.
For Economic Club of New York trivia buffs, I will note that the second ever presentation to this club by a Federal Reserve official was about this very topic. The date was March 18, 1929. Weeks before, the Fed had issued a public statement of concern over stock market speculation, and had provided guidance frowning on bank funding of such speculation. William Harding, a former Fed Chair and then president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, defended the Fed's actions in his talk. He argued that, while the Fed should not act as the arbiter of correct asset prices, it did have a primary responsibility to protect the banking system's capacity to meet the credit needs of households and businesses. At the meeting, critics argued that public statements about inflated asset prices were "fraught with danger;" that the nation's banks were so well managed that they should not "face public admonition"; and, more generally, that the Fed was "out of its sphere."1 Of course, Harding spoke just a few months before the 1929 stock market crash, which signaled the onset of the Great Depression.
www.federalreserve.g...81128a.htm
Strani: 1